🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."